It is one of the most iconic moments in the history of both Broadway and the movies. After months of sparring, then slowly coming to grudging respect, the King of Siam insistently holds out his hand for a dance with Anna, the beautiful English tutor. Reluctantly, Anna gathers her skirt, takes the strong hand, and engages in a passionate dance across the mirrored floors of an impossibly beautiful palace. The moment of tentative romance in “The King And I” is unforgettable.
It is also completely false and utterly ridiculous.
King Mongkut, the scholarly former monk and deeply respected King of Thailand, did employ Anna Leonowens to teach his children and his wives for a little over five years in the mid-1860s. However, almost every other detail in “The King and I” is whimsical nonsense. Much of “The King and I” is a fictional love story created by Rogers and Hammerstein based on a fictional novel by Margaret Landon, who used as her source a fictionalized memoir written by the real Anna – Mrs. Anna Leonowens herself!
Anna Before “The King And I”
Anna Leonowens, the brilliant, beautiful, brave, and resourceful British widow who stands up to the despotic king, was a real person. Her true story is quite different from the yarn she told King Mongkut to bluff her way into the job. Anna Leonowens claimed to be a highborn Englishwoman whose officer/husband had been killed serving in the British Army. Specifically, she said her maiden name was Anna Crawford and that she had lived in Wales in 1834. In truth, Anna Edwards was born in India in 1834. Her biographers believe that she was of mixed race. Her husband, Thomas Leonowens, had been a minor Army clerk. They bounced from place to place across South Asia before he died of apoplexy while managing a Singapore hotel. Anna changed her name, sent her daughter back to England, and sought a job.
So while she was an independent, resourceful woman of British descent, the real Anna Leonowens invented a new identity to secure a job with the King. Some see her as a con artist. I think that’s an unfair assessment. Anna Leonowens was clever, determined, and capable, despite creating a whole new history for herself.
Anna After “The King And I”
After almost six years in Thailand, Anna Leonowens returned to England for her health. She also reunited with her daughter – a character unmentioned in any film or theatrical versions of the story. While she was away, King Mongkut died and was succeeded by his son, Prince Chulalongkorn. Although they exchanged amicable letters, Anna Leonowens was not invited to return to Thailand by her former pupil. (Of note: her son eventually did return to Thailand, joined the military, and became a larger-than-life figure in his own right!)
Needing to support herself, Anna Leonowens moved to North America. She settled on Staten Island, where she established a school for girls. At that time, she began contributing articles to the Atlantic Monthly, spinning beautiful yet fanciful stories of life in Asia. So positive was the reaction to her magazine stories that she wrote her first book.”The English Governess at the Siamese Court” (1870). The book was a bestseller, and the public acclaim led her to write a sequel, Romance of the Harem (1873).
Both Leonowens’ books present fascinating but sensationalized views of her time in Thailand. The first vastly overstates her role in abolishing slavery in Thailand, her influence on the King, and assaults a widely beloved monarch’s personality. The second book repeats an entirely false tale of Tuptim, supposedly a concubine of the King. In this lurid story, a self-indulgent, eccentric, and infinitely cruel King has an innocent girl tortured and brutally executed for wanting freedom and love. In truth, King Mongkut was a scholar, a reformer, and a religious man who would never have condoned such activity.
To this day, the story of “The King and I” is reviled in Thailand. For my American readers, imagine if a woman from Thailand came to America to be a governess for Abraham Lincoln’s children. After being a minor figure in Lincoln’s life, she went back to Asia, where she wrote best-selling books, later turned into major films, claiming Lincoln was vengeful, mean-spirited, cruel, and in need of a woman from another culture to straighten him out. And then add the suggestion that they had a romantic attachment, and you can see how bizarre The King And I seems to the people of Thailand.
Anna Leonowens was a pioneering feminist, educator, and voting rights champion who accomplished much good in her lifetime. She settled in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where she founded the superb Nova Scotia College of Art and Design. In 1897, Anna met her former pupil, now King Chulalongkorn, in London for a brief reunion. He “expressed great sorrow that she had pictured his father as a ‘wicked old man’ in her books.”
Thirty years after her death, Anna Leonowens gained new fame. Writer Margaret Landon discovered the original books and fictionalized them for a modern audience as Anna and the King of Siam. This became the source material for the Broadway, movie, and TV adaptations. Each successive adaptation has retold the story for the needs of a new audience. Irene Dunne played Anna in the 1946 movie version, which became a treatise on democracy. No Asian actors were cast in a role of any importance – a white British actor, Rex Harrison, played King Mongkut of Thailand while a white American actor, Lee J. Cobb played his Prime Minister.
The 1951 Broadway smash makes the king a more central figure but continues to emphasize the vast superiority of Western values and traditions. In creating a ludicrous romantic attachment, discounting King Mongkut’s religious background, marital status, and the 27 year age difference between him and Anna, the real people’s story becomes lost. The most recent film version finally allowed an Asian actor to play the King. However, in the beautifully photographed but historically strange Jodie Foster version, the monkish, intellectual King Mongkut is is presented as a cigar-chomping action hero.
Anna Leonowens truly led a fascinating life before and after her amazing time in Thailand. Recent biographers have concluded that she deserves to be respected for her many accomplishments despite her many fabrications. Just don’t expect to learn her real story from “The King And I.”
Editor’s Note: For other entries in my “History Vs. The Movies” series, click the links below!
I saw the play on Broadway [5th row seat] in 1952 or 3 with Yul Brenner !!!
It was great !
Larry-
WOW! You saw the original production! That is AMAZING! Gertrude Lawrence was in the show until her death in September 1952. Brynner kept doing tours and revivals up until his death in 1985 – 33 years after you saw him!
Barry
I saw Yul Brynner perform in ‘The King and I’ when he already knew he had cancer. Even being as sick as he was, he was AMAZING. His voice.. it was smooth as whiskey and deep as an ocean. Seeing ‘The King and I’ is still one of my favorite memories.
As well, The Magnificent Seven is still one my favorite movies. He was as good on screen as he was onstage.
Rae –
What an amazing memory! It says a lot about him that his performance was still so strong given how sick he was. For all of its historical flaws, the musical did offer us a performance for the ages!
Barry